Of a Threesome and a Solution for Sri Lanka’s Ethnic Conflict: OBSLPO
Nilma Dole in her article titled Menage a Trois on the Sunday Observer on the 20th of January, narrates the “true story” told to her by a macho man about one of his sexual escapades. This (not-so) brilliant attempt by Nilma at feature writing with a dash of erotica proves several things to me, including the fact that Nilma and her “source” have found the perfect solution for the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict, and for some of the key problems the country is facing today.
Since this is quite a long post, I’ll cut it short for those of you who want to end it quickly. Nilma’s (lame excuse for an) article narrates the experiences of a young man who had a threesome. In it, he states “Being with two more makes you feel more concerned and sensitive to their needs.” Which, if I use much cruder terms would translate to “If you fuck two or more at the same time”.
And this is where I had my ingenious idea! One big Sri Lankan Peace Orgy (OBSLPO).
An OBSLPO where everybody fucks everybody would give everybody a chance to be concerned and more sensitive to everybody else’s needs. And the Norwegians can come and watch, and facilitate by means of providing lubricants and rubber.
But hang on. Haven’t that 225 been fucking us all this time? Hmm… That means they’re already sensitive to our needs, or the guy Nilma quotes is completely off track.
Addendum: Since I was in a bit of a stalky mood, I Googled her and facebooked her. Seems she’s on both, and has what’s called an “open” facebook profile. Means stalkers like me can go and randomly check the whole profile out. And I quote from her “About Me” part,
“I love Journalism and am one of the only slang writers in Sri Lanka who speaks the truth!”
Out of sheer morbid curiosity, how can you be one of the only? I think the corrected version on her profile should read “I love to pretend tat I’m a Journalist, and am the only semi-crap erotica writer in Sri Lanka who talks cock!”
Anywhos, read on.
And before I start on my fantastic voyage, some level of credit should go to a half-witted, half-judgmental half-doctor for showing me the way to the article.
So, let’s start the slaughter. And yes, for those of who are planning on commenting at the end of the post, saying I’m biased and harsh and cynical and mean and all that, I am. Because of the hypocrisy and the lack of common sense and direction of the Observer Editor, and because Nilma has contributed to a very discriminating, disempowering and sexist piece of writing. I’ve honestly seen porn flicks which give women more respect.
Many would open their mouths in shock and horror at this French word also called a group of three people. Even those elderly folk with conservative ideals and hush-hush talk would find this article very appaling. However, in this modern age, we shouldn’t turn a blind eye to all that is happening around us.
Stupid point Nilma. Many of us don’t know French. But credit to you for figuring out that people will find this article appalling. Point of clarification here, it’s not the concept of a threesome that people will find appalling, it’s the article. And since you haven’t done your bit of research, let me do it for you. Menage a Trois was the theme for the 1932 Noel Coward play, Design for Living. And threesoms have been there ever since man discovered it, and there is evidence such as paintings, literary references etc to prove that.
Often those narrow-minded thinkers would regard the taboo word as a horrendous thing that only happened in brothels and VIP hotels where only floozies indulged in this practice. However nowadays, don’t be surprised if you find your own child or spouse maybe being part of this new ‘in-thing’ without your knowledge.
This is not an “in thing” darling. It’s just a thing. And no, it’s not being narrow minded. And erm, what the hell is a VIP hotel?
Of course, it can be due to various reasons, from experimenting sexually with oneself to doing something memorable just before marriage. It can also be with certain special people or can be for some fun.
Can’t argue with you on that one, as sex (in whatever form) can be, and is, for a whole lot of reasons. And since I’m not judgmental, I don’t care why people have sex. Although the “certain special people” part IS a bit confusing.
I first enountered my first three group thing when I was touring abroad as the result of participating in sporting activities I did at college. Being all young and experimental in those days, I ventured and sought to finally do it as the ultimate experience I could ever get abroad. I, like my peers felt that doing it in Sri Lanka wasn’t ‘ethical’ and so was quite thrilled at these exciting prospects.
It’s called a threesome, not a “three group thing“. Since there is a word for it, USE IT. And erm, if a threesome is the “ultimate experience” you can get from abroad, I advise you not to do any more traveling abroad. Cos the beaches of Maldives at sunset, the food in Pakistan and the Taj Mahal can be “mind blowing” too. And I’m surprised at your sense of ethics changing depending on your geographical location.
It started with partying really hard into the wee hours of the morning. Yet it was quite dark and I finally chatted up with two women or ‘chicks’ as I referred whom I met at the nightclub. They were foreigners too and that made it even better and less guilty. Basically my thoughts were, we were visitors and we had the right to have fun in a foreign land.
And so the sexism and judging begins. Drunk women are easy lays, especially if they are foreign and at a nightclub at wee hours of the morning. And visitors have the right to have fun in a foriegn land. Probably why we Sri Lankan here in Sri Lanka live lousy lives.
As a macho man, I have this thing against being with a woman in the presence of a nude man. It ruins my candour and also makes me feel degraded fearing the competition around. So I jumped at the opportunity of taking these lovely ladies back to my hotel room.
He he… Macho? Seems like monkey praising his own tail. But your inferioriy complex shines through, when you state your fears of having competition around. And you’re being judgmental again, as you assume that women don’t feel competition. You’re making them appear as lifeless sex objects which you can take back to your hotel room.
We opened a bottle of champagne compliments of the hotel and I turned on the stereo filling the place with soothing Jazz music. The women were good friends and told me that they got along fine and it was definitely not their first experience.
As a personal favour, I’d love to have the name of that hotel so I can stay there if I ever travel to that country. Cos none of the hotels I’ve ever stayed in has given me complementary champagne. Hell, I haven’t even got a complimentary bottle of Sprite. Erm, better leave the James Bond fantasies out of newspapers.
So I thought to myself that I was lucky to be in the company of experienced women even though in the back of my mind, I feared ‘would they judge me by my performance and most importantly, will I be good?’
Now now, you are the “Macho” man right? Why do you even think of doubting your “capabilities”?
I didn’t have time to worry about that, because these ladies went down straight to business telling that they didn’t have much time to waste.
I was actually a tad bit clueless but I played along. There was alot of vigourous activity from both sides and me, be being a real player on field and off it, played my role in this drama.
Coming to this part,
- I think you’re lying through your teeth, but hey! That’s just me.
- I didn’t know that the Sunday Observer published erotica! I should buy it more often.
- And erm, vigorous activity from both sides, and you being a “real player” ya? O-kay then.
It blew my mind, seriously! I was thinking to myself that I really was the luckiest person of the moment and I remember I wished this euphoric feeling would last forever. And even if it did finish, I’d savour it for my whole life. The experience was amazing and I really was happy I did it.
Since you seem to have enjoyed it, good for you. But this is where the really worrying and hypocritical stuff begins, which I’m going to quote in whole, and respond in whole.
I don’t believe that such a thing could ruin anyone’s life and make them bad in any way. However, as a person with values, I strongly advise everyone NOT to indulge in it once you get married or have a steady partner since it only brings you a feeling of guilt.
I was young and it helped me understand more about myself. Ideally, it has helped me understand about the effects and joys of the opposite sex better. Being with two more makes you feel more concerned and sensitive to their needs. Even though you can’t satisfy both of them together you can at least try and they will naturally go with the flow.
The rest will eventually fall in place. I have no regrets.
Today I lead a wonderful marital life and my spouse is an understanding and a caring partner. I am happy I did it and finished it all when I was young. And it was alright I think in my view that I did it and experienced it once and for all instead of cheating on my partner.
I’ve questioned your values before, and I’m going to question your “values” again. This is NOT because you had a threesome. I’m a strong believer that what happens between informed consenting adults, should remain their prerogative. So I don’t have the right, nor will I judge you on your sex life. However, I will question your sense of value, as it seems to be based more on you being judgmental, than of logical values.
Since it apparently made you understand more about yourself, good for you. It helped me understand more about you as well. It showed me that you’re sexist, hypocritical, judgmental, and that you’re an ego-centric wannabe. And it also shows me that you think only you can satisfy women in a threesome, that only penetration can give pleasure, and that you’re under the false assumption that you’re a sex god. Geez!
And then you become even more judgmental and ego centric. You’re probably the type of man that Sach refers to as a person who can’t be called a male chauvinistic pig, becuase that would be an insult to pigs. You’re the type that says “do whatever you want, and when you get married to a nice woman, all your sins would be forgiven”. You’re and insult to all men, and don’t think I’m a woman writing this, cos I’m not. Last time I checked (which was about an hour ago when I went to the loo) I was a man.
You’re a sad little creature, and Nilma is an even sadder creature for writing that lame excuse for an article.
Lol! Well said, I found the article particularly distasteful as it comes across extremely judgmental and sexist. To sum it up, it was a “hey lookit me, I’m the coolest because I fucked two chicks, but don’t do it yourself because you probably can’t handle it as well as I did”.
Bollocks. I bet he spends a lot more time in a locked up bathroom with a ruler, rather than engaging in these ‘three-group things’.
Darwin - January 31, 2008 at 7:46 pm |
First PBG I must say you needed more than a bit of cooling off before you wrote this. It might have come out a lot better
Having said that and after reading all of the linked articles, i must tentatively agree on what you say (albeit a very emotional say). That article in the observer had no point to make, no message to convey and it wasn’t something Id have expected from a national newspaper. Its story disheartens me a great deal since its obviously a very masochistic and degrading one. And as Ive said on Sach’s post, guys like that do give good guys a bad name. What bothers me about the guy in the article is that he calls a threesome unethical and then says its a good thing in the end. Its troubling
The concept of Menage a trois would be tasteful or distasteful according to local culture. But shoudnt what mature and intelligent people do in their own time and privacy be their business and not something to be judged by us? If anyone wishes to have a threesome in his/her privacy, why should we care? Its free will.
Dili - January 31, 2008 at 7:46 pm |
Thanks Darwin…
@Dili: Yup, a bit of cooling off would’ve definitely helped, but I think what was going through my mind has been properly reflected here cos I didn’t cool off. And I’m echoing your point on the reason as to why they published it. Filler perhaps?
pinkboxinggloves - February 1, 2008 at 8:24 am |
Well said mate! Makes one wonder what the editors at the rag are doing. Or maybe they’re so frustrated that they allow this sort of trash because it’s the closest thing to action that they get! Oh well!
Jaliya Wijewardene - February 1, 2008 at 11:24 am |
Nilma was kind enough to (attempt) to respond to my post. Whilst saying “Grow up and go get a life! Nobody reads blog crap. The majority of the country reads the Sunday Observer so go fuck off!“, she herself has a blog.
And I was a bit disappointed actually, despite the emotions, my post had a (even though I say it myself) framework and some logic into it. She on the otherhand, is self contradictory and full of the age old “gay MPs in Parliament and rantings about the sex drive of our Chief Justice“, which most of us grew out of ages ago.
But, kudos to the girl. As she herself accepted, “I mean just because I wrote some crap…“.
Nilma, read some good writing, do your research, get a set of values, and then come and talk about “liberal” issues. There’s a broad line between feeling for issues and talking about them, and writing “crap” in order to get attention. The latter is called pseudo-intellect, or wannabe. Don’t be a wannabe.
pinkboxinggloves - February 1, 2008 at 4:32 pm |
Oh, and her “response” is here:
http://hearsayprincess.blogspot.com/2008/02/what-fuck.html
pinkboxinggloves - February 1, 2008 at 4:41 pm |
Since Nilma doesn’t allow anonymous comments, I’ve posted my reply to her post below. And I’ve emailed her, so she has a chance to response.
Oh my… Quite the (hypo)critical one you are, aren’t you angel?
I’m doing this cos I think you have the passion for journalism, and even though you’re on the wrong track, with a bit of work (from you, and from others), you can be converted into a good one. Plus I have a bit of free time on my hands.
Lets start.
I think you’re right in the first part of the post, when you say that you’re writing “crap” in National Newspapers of Sri Lanka. It’s something of a complex, which tells you to write stuff which people will talk about, so you become the (off) centre of attention.
(Spelling correction, it’s BLOODY, not BLODDY, and IDIOSYNCRASIES not IDIOSYNCRASES)
And honestly I don’t think anybody out there (well, except people like your angelic self) would be JEALOUS of someone who’s a journalist at the Sunday Bloody Observer!!! Hear hear! That’s just to funny to pass! Grow up child! To be jealous of someone working for the Observer!. If you said the Daily Mirror, Sunday Times, or even the Leader, we’d be happy to take it in. BUT THE BLEEDING OBSERVER? That’s worse than the Daily Noise!
And as I said earlier, there’s quite a big difference between being from the “New Generation” wanting to break barriers, and being conservative. And as you clearly showed to everybody out there, there’s also a huge a difference between writing of progressive and controversial topics, and shouting out for attention. You’re clearly not the smart kid who creates a kitchen extension out of Lego, you’re the one who sticks a 2X8 Lego brick up the ass and becomes a star for an hour.
I think the editor was right in roaring at you, as this does degrade the paper. But again, I’d like to do a bit of clarification here. It’s not the article that degrades the paper, it’s the fact that they hired someone with your (lack of) literary capabilities.
I’m a strong believer in a concept called knowledge sharing. So let me share this piece of knowledge with you.
When I entered the Sexual Rights field about four years ago, I was just like you are now. I wanted to shout things which would make people talk, so that I can get a wee bit of attention, and that people would talk for hours about something I brought up.
But that’s like a fart in the air. People get oh so excited about it, and then completely forget it. Don’t be a fart. Be a piece of shit, cos if you leave a proper solid piece of shit in the middle of the room, people would remember and talk about it for years to come.
And four more point before I close.
1) If you’re so open about yourself, why the sudden closure of the facebook profile, and making it private?
Tsk tsk… Be true to what you say child.
2) If all bloggers are idiots, and if you yourself has (quite an old) blog, what does that make you?
3) The actual line is “Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, nor hell a fury like a woman scorned“, and it’s from Mourning Bride my William Congreve. Not William Shakespeare. if you just say “Hell hath no fury“, that’s you saying there’s not fury in hell. Doesn’t make any sense.
4) If you’re doing a post, and if you know (or if people have repeatedly told you) that your spelling sucks and that your grammar is bad, type the post up in something like Word, do a spell/grammar check, and then copy paste it onto blogger.
Regards, PBG.
pinkboxinggloves - February 2, 2008 at 9:52 am |
Read this.
Read her response.
Honoured to find out I’m half-witted.
Half Doctor - February 2, 2008 at 3:46 pm |
Dear [Deleted],
Ummm dude thanks for pointing this out and i agree with you in spirit but ummm calm down maybe. I would have appreciated a better criticism/response from you of this
But having said that the fact that Nilma’s article is in bad taste is a misnomer. But lets try and be mature about things instead of bleating around like castrated lambs.
Firstly, i do agree with you that the moral values of the protagonist of Nilma Dole’s article is right up there with our parliamentarians(hang on am i insulting parliamentarians). Given the wide readership of the Observer magazine especially by teenagers it indeed appears to suggest that the only way to enjoy a happy marriage is to precede it with a “mind blowing threesome”. Accuse me of being a boorish cow but i like my morals the way they are at the moment, thank you very much and threesomes is not something i want on my menu. Even more worrying is the last para re the suggestion that it leads to a happy married life. How i wonder? Of course the question you raise below the ranting is the negligence of the rights of the woman as well as how would the same male take respond to marrying a woman who is open about the fact that she has been sexually active. This is where my issues with this article really begin. In that the writer has not bothered to explore the issue in its full complexity.
The questions to be raised should have been as to whether Men in general continue to feel threatened of the self confident and liberated women within their own communities. Or as to if Sri Lankan society is really progressive and liberal. Why then the need to do this away from SL? Why the coming back to the nuclear family and the “happiness” it brings? Obviously Sri Lanka is at best and in the main a pseudo liberal society but this is quite clearly fact that is lost on the writer.
The writer herself needs to be aware of the responsibilities that come with the freedom of expression. There is a line between courageous reporting and plain stupid sensationalism; a distinction lost on nilma dole. Yes Nilma,lets write about sexuality and discuss it in the mainstream but it is precisely this kind of writing that ensures that the issues of sex and gender stay hidden under the proverbial carpet. If you think your doing the liberal movement a service please re think it. Given the current socio-political situation in the country there is a huge upswing in the idea of the Western prostitute. This kind of writing does a hell of a lot to further that idea and so in reality your liberal tinge is actually doing a disservice to those campaigning against such radicalism.
But [Deleted], you getting all worked up and shouting your ass off isn’t helping much either. I expected a more balanced critique of the issues this raises and not so much a personal attack on the writer herself. Lets be adults about this please. This is why SL continues to slide backwards cuz we are not careful about how we respond to the issues that hit at us. My thoughts kthx.
Negligible Minoritist - February 2, 2008 at 6:44 pm |
Hehe… Posts are more fun when written in the heat of the moment.. Good on you for publishing it without trying to be p.c about it. Blimey that article really is shocking! Worrying that it came from a girl :S Although after reading her attempt at a counter argument I do just feel sorry for her, she seems rather lost n fighting blindly without much of a clue as to what she’s actually saying or meaning to say.
Pink Mist - February 11, 2008 at 6:39 pm |
Nilma’s article was ill written and in poor taste. her replies, rants and raves on her blog and elsewhere are just sad. I think your post is all the better for being written while still worked up… have you considered mailing a copy of it and your letter to ND to the editor of the Observer? Just a thought.
Angel - February 12, 2008 at 6:22 pm |
Well Angel, (Sounds corny!
)
I thought of actually writing to the editor, but since I’m writing freelance for the Mirror Mag, and since I’m fresh to the whole journalism world, kinda decided against it. Cos it might not be taken in a positive way. But I’ve emailed Nilma on all the posts/comments that I’ve done referring to her.
pinkboxinggloves - February 12, 2008 at 9:21 pm |